playing god? in the classroom is an educational resource designed to accompany the playing god? podcast, for use by instructors to introduce bioethics concepts and facilitate discussions of ethics among high school and above students. The playing god? in the classroom resources are free and available for non-commercial uses. For other uses and more information, please contact [email protected].
This Lesson Plan accompanies Episode 5, Season 1 of playing god?
Click here to access this Lesson Plan in a printable pdf format
CLICK HERE TO ACCESS A PDF OF THE HANDOUT THAT ACCOMPANIES THIS LESSON PLAN
Summary
Jen Dingle yearned to get pregnant and have children, but there was one problem: she was born without a uterus. She was searching for a way to become a mother when she learned that a local research hospital was starting up a uterus transplant program – one of the first in the United States. Jen shares her personal experience with listeners and the Podcast goes on to explore the risks, financial costs, and ethics issues of this new combination of organ transplant and reproductive technology.
This Lesson Plan can facilitate a discussion about the ethics decisions that accompany the development of new medical technologies: questions of fair access, appropriate oversight and regulation, and favorable risk-benefit ratios. It also addresses the special challenges and issues that arise when organ transplants are combined with reproductive technologies. Students will compare the ethics trade-offs of three different ways uteruses can be donated and will analyze the ethics of other reproductive technologies.
Vocabulary
The following are key terms used in the Episode and their definitions. The terms are marked in bold when they appear elsewhere in the Lesson Plan.
Discussion Guide
The following Assessment Questions can be used by instructors to evaluate student comprehension of Andrea’s story and the bioethics concepts featured in the Podcast Episode. The Discussion Questions can prompt students to make claims and provide evidence and their reasoning. Student comprehension and views can be assessed before and after listening to the Episode and/or participating in the group activity.
Sample Activities
The activities allow students to actively engage with the bioethics questions at the center of the Episode. Students will develop critical thinking skills and reason-based judgment by citing evidence from the Podcast and other sources. In bioethics, there often isn’t a single “right” answer to a particular question; ideally, students will express and evaluate diverse viewpoints about complex, real-world problems.
Additional Resources
Further readings about key topics covered in the Episode.
Careers Mentioned
The following is a list of different careers and specific professionals mentioned in the Episode.
About this Lesson Plan
The playing god? in the classroom resources are free and open to use for non-commercial purposes. For other uses and more information, please contact [email protected].
To develop these materials, the Berman Institute has collaborated with a group of teachers participating in the U.S. Department of Energy’s Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellowship Program, which provides accomplished K-12 STEM educators the opportunity to spend 11 months working in federal agencies or in U.S. Congressional offices, applying their extensive knowledge and classroom experiences to national education program and/or education policy efforts. Eight of the Fellows, drawn from public and private schools across the country, formed an advisory board that is helping shape, review, and pilot the educational materials.
The playing god? Podcast is a production of the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics Dracopoulos-Bloomberg iDeas Lab. Season One was co-produced with Pushkin Industries with support from the Greenwall Foundation.
© 2024 Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics
The Podcast Episode and this lesson plan are not designed to answer patient-specific clinical, professional, legal, or ethical questions. Information contained herein is not intended as a substitute for professional consultation.