Seminar Series – Advance care planning during a pandemic: by Gloria Ramsey, JD, RN, FNAP, FAAN

Apr 12
12:00 pm - 1:00 pm

The Hutzler-Rives Memorial Lecture

Advance Care Planning During a Pandemic: Respecting Choices and Addressing Challenges
for Racially and Ethnically Diverse Communities by Gloria Ramsey, JD, RN, FNAP, FAAN

Join us online to participate in the seminar
https://jh.zoom.us/j/95252110022?pwd=VUpvY0R2cHd1S0pqK1hpQlFOQklZdz09

Password: Seminar

Gloria Ramsey, Associate Dean for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion at the Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, promotes and strategically furthers the school’s values of diversity and inclusion by bolstering JHSON’s excellence, innovation, and impact within education, practice, and the profession. She has been a nurse and attorney engaged in interdisciplinary research/scholarship related to bioethics, end-of-life care, and advance care planning for more than two decades (Hastings Center, American Nurses Association, American Bar Association). She provides leadership to national projects focusing on end-of-life care and advance care planning for African-American patients/families and persons with disabilities. Ramsey is an advocate for engaging racially and ethnically diverse populations and faith communities for participation in research and partnering/collaborating on community-based health disparity interventions. She has taught bioethics, research, public health, military ethics, and health policy to DNP and PhD nursing students and interprofessional graduate students. She is a Distinguished Practitioner of the National Academies of Practice, immediate past member of the Diversity Advisory Council of the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization, and a member of the American Academy of Nursing Cultural Competency and Health Equity and Bioethics expert panels.

 

Seminar Series: The Paradoxical Fragility of the Norms of Protection of Health Care in War by Len Rubenstein, JD

Oct 11
12:00 pm - 1:00 pm

Attend via Zoom
Passcode: Seminar

More than 150 years ago the first Geneva Convention outlawed attacks on wounded and sick soldiers and their caregivers in armed conflict.  Over time the law extended protections to civilians and required combatants to take affirmative precautions to avoid harm to health workers, hospitals, ambulances, and patients. These laws and their underlying norms are among the most widely accepted elements of international law. Yet the persistence and severity of violence of health care in war not only shows widespread noncompliance but suggests that competing, sometimes unarticulated, norms are employed to rationalize the violence.  

Leonard Rubenstein is a lawyer whose work focuses on health and human rights, especially the protection of health in armed conflict and the roles of health professionals in human rights. A core member of the Berman Institute of Bioethics, he has a joint appointment in the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, where he is Director of the Program on Human Rights, Health and Conflict at the Center for Public Health and Human Rights. and a core faculty member of the Johns Hopkins Center for Humanitarian Health. 

Prior to coming to Johns Hopkins, he served as Executive Director and then President of Physicians for Human Rights, as a Jennings Randolph Senior Fellow at the United States Institute of Peace, and as Executive Director of the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law. 

Seminar Series: Rage Renegades with Myisha Cherry, MDiv, PhD

Oct 25
12:00 pm - 1:00 pm

Attend via Zoom
Passcode: Seminar

“Rage Renegades” refer to allies with rage at racial injustice. They are rage renegades because although their privilege and place in a white-supremacist society is meant to guarantee that they will be complicit or engage in racism as a way to maintain racial domination, they instead show outrage at such a society. In doing so, they rebel against a racist system that was designed to benefit them exclusively. But rage renegading can also go wrong when it reinforces the same white supremacy that the rage aims to challenge. In this seminar, Professor Cherry will describe four ways in which this misdirection can happen as well as provide some suggestions for how to steer clear of it.  

Myisha Cherry is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Riverside. Her research is primarily concerned with the role of emotions and attitudes in public life. Cherry’s books include “UnMuted: Conversations on Prejudice, Oppression, and Social Justice” (Oxford University Press) and, co-edited with Owen Flanagan, “The Moral Psychology of Anger” (Rowman & Littlefield). Her latest book is “The Case for Rage: Why Anger is Essential to Anti-racist Struggle” (Oxford University Press). Her work on emotions and race has appeared in The Atlantic, Boston Review, Los Angeles Times, Salon, Huffington Post, WomanKind, and New Philosopher Magazine. Cherry is also the host of the UnMute Podcast, where she interviews philosophers about the social and political issues of our day.